Percepções Sociais da Mediação no Brasil e na Polônia: Barreiras Culturais e Oportunidades para a Resolução Sustentável de Conflitos

Sidney Soares Filho; Leszek Cichobłaziński

doi:10.5020/2317-2150.2025.16324

Authors

Sidney Soares Filho Universidade de Fortaleza, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brasil https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4107-6290
Leszek Cichobłaziński Częstochowa University of Technology, Częstochowa, Polônia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7743-4574

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5020/2317-2150.2025.16324

Keywords:

mediation, conflict resolution, legal culture, Brazil, Poland

Abstract

Mediation has gained increasing recognition as an alternative method of dispute resolution, yet its acceptance still depends on cultural and institutional legitimacy. This article compares the Brazilian and Polish experiences, highlighting how legal frameworks, public trust, professional attitudes, and cultural traditions influence the development of mediation. The analysis shows that resistance is not merely a legal issue, but one rooted in adversarial legal cultures and limited public awareness. At the same time, both countries display promising opportunities: in Brazil, the rise of community mediation and digital platforms; in Poland, the active role of judges and the support of European institutions. By examining these contrasts, the study suggests that the consolidation of mediation requires not only laws and policies, but also strategies capable of reshaping professional practices and strengthening social trust.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Sidney Soares Filho, Universidade de Fortaleza, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brasil

Doutor e Mestre em Direito, Doutorando em Educação (UFC), especialista em Direito Público com área de concentração em Direito Constitucional e em Direito Processual. É bacharel em Direito e em Administração Pública. Professor do Mestrado Profissional em Direito e Gestão de Conflitos da Universidade Fortaleza (UNIFOR). Lattes: http://lattes.cnpq.br/9218335907593806. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4107-6290

Leszek Cichobłaziński, Częstochowa University of Technology, Częstochowa, Polônia

Professor Doutor vinculado ao Department of Sociology and Psychology of Management Częstochowa University of Technology, Polônia. - +48 605 059. E-mail: lech@zim.pcz.plz. ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7743-4574

References

BROOME, B. J. Negotiating the nexus: Symbiotic relationship of theory and practice in conflict management. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, [s. l.], v. 10, p. 252-264, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ncmr.12105

CASER, U.; CEBOLA, C. M.; VASCONCELOS, L.; FERRO, F. Environmental mediation: an instrument for collaborative decision making in territorial planning. Finisterra - Revista Portuguesa de Geografia, [s. l.], n. 104, p. 109-120, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18055/Finis6969

CICHOBŁAZIŃSKI, L. Mediacje w sporach zbiorowych. Częstochowa: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Częstochowskiej, 2010.

CICHOBŁAZIŃSKI, L. Resolving collective disputes in Poland: A narrative perspective. In: MÜLLER, A. P.; BECKER, L. (org.). Narrative and innovation: New Ideas for Business Administration, Strategic Management and Entrepreneurship. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien, 2013. p.119-129.

DHIAULHAQ, A. et al. Resolving industrial plantation conflicts in Indonesia: Can mediation deliver? Forest Policy and Economics, [s. l.], v. 41, p. 22-30, abr. 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2014.01.003

ELKOURI, F.; ELKOURI, E. A. How arbitration works. Washington: Bureau of National Affairs, 2017.

INTERNATIONAL LABOUR ORGANIZATION. ILOSTAT. Geneva: ILO, 2018. Disponível em: https://www.ilo.org/. Acesso em: 2 maio 2025.

POLAND. Law about the settlement of collective labor disputes, created on 23 May 1991. Journal of Law, Geneva, 1991. Disponível em: https://www.ilo.org/dyn/natlex/docs/ELECTRONIC/22401/91766/F-1456565262/POL22401%20Eng.pdf. Acesso em: 2 fev. 2025.

HILL-YARDIN, E. L. et al. A chat (GPT) about the future of scientific publishing. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, [s. l.], v. 110, p. 152-154, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2023.02.022

LANKAŠOVÁ, R. Mediation in work environment. In: GREGAR, A.; HORÁK, M. (eds.). Work and organization psychology 2017: – Work potential and its changes over time. Proceedings of the 16th International Conference WAOP, Zlín, 24-25 maio 2017. Zlín: Tomas Bata University, 2017. p. 333-340.

LUND, B. D.; WANG, T. Chatting about ChatGPT: How may AI and GPT impact academia and libraries? Library Hi Tech News, [s. l.], v. 40, n. 3, p. 26-29, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-02-2023-0016

MCGEE, R. W. Is ChatGPT biased against conservatives? An empirical study? An Empirical Study. SSRN, [s. l.], 15 fev. 2023. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4359405

OPENAI. ChatGPT: GPT-3.5-based. OpenAI, San Francisco, 2023. Disponível em: https://www.openai.com/. Acesso em: 12 maio 2025.

POLAND. Constitution of Republic of Poland, created on 2 Apr. 1997. Constituição da República da Polônia. SEJM, Dziennik Ustaw, 2 Apr.1997. Disponível em: https://www.sejm.gov.pl/prawo/konst/angielski/kon1.htm. Acesso em: 2 fev. 2025.

RITTEL, H. W. J.; WEBBER, M. M. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, [s. l.], v. 4, n. 2, p. 155-169, 1973. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730

SOCIAL DIALOGUE LIBRARY – MINISTRY OF LABOR AND SOCIAL POLICY. Mediation in Poland. Warsaw: MRPiPS, 2008. p. 45.

SOCIAL DIALOGUE LIBRARY – MINISTRY OF LABOR AND SOCIAL POLICY. Informator. Warsaw: MRPiPS, 2016. p. 50.

SURAMEERY, N. M. S.; SHAKOR, M. Y. Use ChatGPT to solve programming bugs. International Journal of Information Technology & Computer Engineering (IJITC), v. 3, n. 1, p. 17-22, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55529/ijitc.31.17.22