Peer Review Process

Each article submitted to Pensar – Journal of Legal Sciences initially undergoes a desk review process in which editors assess its compliance with the journal's standards and editorial guidelines, as well as the significance of the discussion for advancing knowledge in the legal field.

Subsequently, the article is sent to expert reviewers in the field, following a blind-review process.

Reviewers provide feedback on the article, recommending its approval, approval with revisions, or rejection. Reviewers may contribute to enhancing the original version through their comments, suggestions, and recommended references. Authors will be informed of the reviewer's feedback while maintaining the anonymity of the reviewer. If approved with revisions, authors can amend the assessed text and submit an updated version for further review rounds, potentially leading to final approval for publication.

Before publication, the article undergoes formatting and grammar checks.