The guarantee of freedom of association and collective bargaining rights to domestic workers: two opposite models, Brazil and Canada
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5020/2317-2150.2017.6363Keywords:
Freedom of association. Collective Bargaining. Domestic work. ILO Convention 189. Brazil. Canada.Abstract
The study’s main objective is to question the exclusion of domestic workers from freedom of association and collective bargaining rights and to propose possible policy solutions to allow the rights to these workers. The paper focuses in the Canadian and in the Brazilian cases. Even though the Brazilian and Canadian models illustrate two very different approaches towards collective organization, both countries present regulatory challenges to the effective recognition of domestic workers’ freedom of association and collective bargaining rights. The policy solutions to these challenges in the case of domestic work can serve other groups of vulnerable workers, such as migrants, low wage service workers, informal workers. The methodology is developed through bibliographical and documentary analysis.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2017-12-22
How to Cite
Moreira Gomes, A. V., & Banerjee, R. (2017). The guarantee of freedom of association and collective bargaining rights to domestic workers: two opposite models, Brazil and Canada. Pensar - Journal of Legal Sciences, 22(3). https://doi.org/10.5020/2317-2150.2017.6363
Issue
Section
Theoretical articles with high analytical rigor
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Ana Virgínia Moreira Gomes, Rupa Banerjee

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
For more information, please visit: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/









