‘It Does Not Matter Whether You Are a Woman or a Man’: An Analysis of the Gendering of Human Resource Management Policies and Practices in Organisations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5020/2318-0722.2025.31.e17308Keywords:
gendering, policies and practices, human resources management, gender, womenAbstract
Some companies claim to have human resource management (HRM) policies and practices aimed at promoting gender equality. However, policy neutrality and superficial measures do not contribute to creating equitable workplaces for women and men. This study aimed to analyse the gendering of HRM policies and practices in organisational settings. A qualitative descriptive study was conducted with 14 women of different ages working in various fields and organisations. It was concluded that, although formulated according to a logic of neutrality, HRM policies and practices are gendered, as they are structured around standards that privilege male career trajectories. The findings demonstrate that these practices implicitly reproduce gender inequalities, particularly in recruitment and selection, professional development, career progression, and parenthood policies. Furthermore, by disregarding historical and social inequalities, meritocratic discourse contributes to the normalisation of these asymmetries. The results highlight the need to critically examine not only explicit factors but also the subtle and silenced mechanisms that sustain organisational sexism, thereby fostering the development of more inclusive HRM policies and practices that are responsive to gender inequalities.
Downloads
Translation
References
Acker, J. (2006). Inequality regimes: Gender, class, and race in organizations. Gender & Society, 20(4), 441-464. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243206289499
Ali, M. (2015). Impact of gender-focused human resource management on performance: The mediating effects of gender diversity. Australian Journal of Management, 41(2), 376–397. https://doi.org/10.1177/0312896214565119
Azungah, T. (2018). Qualitative research: Deductive and inductive approaches to data analysis. Qualitative Research Journal, 18(4), 383–400. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-D-18-00035
Bardin L. (2011). Análise de conteúdo. Edições 70.
Carrieri, A. de P., Diniz, A. P. R., Souza, E. M., & Menezes, R. S. S. (2013). Gender and work: Representations of femininities and masculinities in the view of women brazilian executives. BAR - Brazilian Administration Review, 10(3), 281-303. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1807-76922013005000002
Clark, S., McGrane, A., Boyle, N., Joksimovic, N., Burke, L., Rock, N., & O'Sullivan, K. (2020). "You're a teacher, you're a mother, you're a worker": Gender inequality during COVID‐19 in Ireland. Gender, Work & Organization, 28(4), 135–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12611
Collins, C., Landivar, L. C., Ruppanner, L., & Scarborough, W. J. (2020). COVID‐19 and the gender gap in work hours. Gender, Work & Organization, 28(S1), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12506
Daniel, C. (2011). O trabalho e a questão de gênero: A participação de mulheres na dinâmica do trabalho. O Social em Questão, 14(25/26), 323–344. https://osocialemquestao.ser.puc-rio.br/media/17_osq_25_26_daniel.pdf
Duarte, E. R., & Gallon, S. (2022). “Não, eu não sofro com isso”: a análise da manipulação da subjetividade da mulher executiva na ascensão da carreira. Brazilian Business Review, 19(1), 78-95. https://doi.org/10.15728/bbr.2022.19.1.5
Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L (2007). Women and the Labyrinth of Leadership. Harvard business review, 85(9), 62-71.
Eccel, C. S., & Grisci, C. L. I. (2011). Trabalho e gênero: A produção de masculinidades na perspectiva de homens e mulheres. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, 9(1), 57–78. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-39512011000100005
Feng, Z., & Savani, K. (2020). Covid-19 created a gender gap in perceived work productivity and job satisfaction: Implications for dual-career parents working from home. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 35(7/8), 719–736. https://doi.org/10.1108/GM-07-2020-0202
Fraga, A. M., Gallon, S., & Vaz, E. R. D. (2021). Estereótipo, preconceito e assédio nas trajetórias de expatriadas brasileiras. Revista Pensamento Contemporâneo em Administração 15(1), 165-179. https://doi.org/10.12712/rpca.v15i1.46524
Fraga, A. M., & Rocha-de-Oliveira, S. (2020). Mobilidades no labirinto: Tensionando as fronteiras nas carreiras de mulheres. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, 18(spe), 757-769. https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-395120190141
Fraga, A. M., Antunes, E. D. D., & Rocha-de-Oliveira, S. (2020). O/A profissional: As interfaces de gênero, carreira e expatriação na construção de trajetórias de mulheres expatriadas. Brazilian Business Review, 17(2), 192–210. https://doi.org/10.15728/bbr.2020.17.2.4
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 491-512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56(2), 109-118. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.2.109
Heikkinen, S., & Lämsä, A. M. 2017. Narratives of spousal support for the careers of men in managerial posts. Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, 24(2), 171-193. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12157
Hirata, H., & Kergoat, D. (2007). Novas configurações da divisão sexual do trabalho. Cadernos de Pesquisa, 37(132), 595–609. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-15742007000300005
Hryniewicz, L. G. C., & Vianna, M. A. (2018). Mulheres em posição de liderança: Obstáculos e expectativas de gênero em cargos gerenciais. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, 16(3), 331-344. https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-395174876
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. (2024). Estatísticas de gênero: Indicadores sociais das mulheres no Brasil. https://www.ibge.gov.br/estatisticas/multidominio/genero/20163-estatisticas-de-genero-indicadores-sociais-das-mulheres-no-brasil.html?=&t=resultados
Knights, D. (2019). Gender still at work: Interrogating identity in discourses and practices of masculinity. Gender, Work, and Organization, 26(1), 18-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12338
Lee, J., & Parpart, J. L. (2018). Constructing gender identity through masculinity in CSR reports: The South Korean case. Business Ethics: A European Review, 27(4), 309–323. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12191
Lei nº 15.371, de 31 de março de 2026. (2026). Altera a legislação para dispor sobre as novas diretrizes do Poder Executivo. Presidência da República. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2023-2026/2026/lei/l15371.htm
Sahgal, P. (2007). Gender discrimination: Beliefs and experiences: A comparative perspective of women and men in the Delhi Police. Journal of International Women's Studies, 9(1), 135–152. https://vc.bridgew.edu/jiws/vol9/iss1/9/
Schnurr, S., Zayts, O., Schroeder, A., & Coyte-Hopkins, K. L. (2019). “It's not acceptable for the husband to stay at home”: Taking a discourse analytical approach to capture the gendering of work. Gender, Work, and Organization, 27(3), 414-434. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12408
Sheerin, C., & Linehan, M. (2018). Gender performativity and hegemonic masculinity in investment management. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 33(7), 561–576. https://doi.org/10.1108/GM-10-2017-0122
Shortland, S., & Perkins, S. J. (2020). Women’s expatriate careers: Losing trust in organisational equality and diversity policy implementation? Journal of Global Mobility, 8(2), 183-208. https://doi.org/10.1108/JGM-01-2020-0007
Solnit, R. (2017). Os homens explicam tudo para mim. Cultrix.
Staniscuaski, F., Kmetzsch, L., Soletti, R. C., Reichert, F., Zandonà, E., Ludwig, Z. M. C., Lima, E. F., Neumann, A., Schwartz, F. P., Mello-Carpes, P. B., Tamajusuku, A. S. K., Werneck, F. P., Ricachenevsky, F. K., Infanger, C. B., Seixas, A., Staats, C. C., & Oliveira, L. (2021). Gender, race and parenthood impact academic productivity during the COVID-19 pandemic: From survey to action. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, artigo 663252. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.663252
Sullivan, S. E, & Mainiero, L. (2008). Using the kaleidoscope career model to understand the changing patterns of women’s careers: Designing HRD programs that attract and retain women. Developing Human Resources, 10(1), 32-49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422307310110
United Nations. (n.d.). Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls. Sustainable Development Goals. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/gender-equality/
Webber, G. R., & Giuffre, P. (2019). Women's relationships with women at work: Barriers to solidarity. Sociology Compass, 13(6), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12698
Woodhams, C., & Lupton, B. (2006). Does size matter? Gender-based equal opportunity in UK small and medium enterprises. Women in Management Review, 21(2), 143-169. https://doi.org/10.1108/09649420610650710
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Administrative Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Para publicação de trabalhos, os autores deverão assinar a Carta de Direitos Autorais, cujo modelo será enviado aos autores por e-mail, reservando os direitos, até mesmo de tradução, à RCA.
Para os textos que apresentam imagens (fotografias, retratos, obras de artes plásticas, desenhos fotografados, obras fotográficas em geral, mapas, figuras e outros), os autores devem encaminhar para a RCA carta original de autorização da empresa que detém a concessão e o direito de uso da imagem. A carta deve estar em papel timbrado e assinada pelo responsável da empresa, com autorização para o uso e a reprodução das imagens utilizadas no trabalho. O corpo da carta deve conter que a empresa é detentora dos direitos sobre as imagens e que dá direito de reprodução para a RCA. É importante salientar que os autores são responsáveis por eventuais problemas de direitos de reprodução das imagens que compõem o artigo.
A instituição e/ou qualquer dos organismos editoriais desta publicação NÃO SE RESPONSABILIZAM pelas opiniões, ideias e conceitos emitidos nos textos, por serem de inteira responsabilidade de seus autores












