Participation in Researches with Participative Methodologies: Reflections about Experiences

Authors

  • José Renato Gatto Júnior Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto
  • Leandra Andréia de Sousa Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto
  • Sébastien Pesce Université François Rabelais de Tours
  • Cinira Magali Fortuna Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5020/18061230.2018.8643

Keywords:

Citizen Participation, Qualitative Research, Community-based Participatory Research.

Abstract

Objective: Thus, this article seeks to provoke new reflections about participation, based on some research experiences with participatory methodology. Methods: The steps for the composition of this reflection were: 1-) selection of significant characteristics from the experiences during research with participatory methodologies 2-) presentation and discussion of the selected characteristics; and 3-) synthesizing relevant annotations. The following significant characteristics were considered: the question of participation as a process (levels of participation throughout the investigative process); flexibility in the use of data collection techniques: a key point in the construction of the participatory process; the cycles: new participants, new forms of participation. Results: Based on these considerations, in the process of participation, the participation or level of participation is expected to progressively vary (number of participants and intensity of participation - which leads to submissions of amendments in ethics committees) throughout the course of the research. While some advocate flexibility as a rigor criterion in participatory research, others argue that the flexible approach is still considered to be of less scientific rigor. Conclusion: Participation as a process under construction, using flexibility and other transformative devices, is seen as a powerful tool to be intensively developed during a participatory methodology research.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bergold J, Thomas S. Participatory Research Methods: A Methodological Approach in Motion. Forum: Qualitative Social Research [periódico na Internet]. 2012 [acesso em 2017 Dez 5]; 13(1). Disponível em: http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1801/3334.

Monceau G, Soulière M. Mener la recherche avec les sujets concernés: comment et pour quels résultats? . Éducation et socialisation Les Cahiers du CERFEE [periódico na Internet]. 2017 [acesso em 2017 Dez 5]. Disponível em: http://journals.openedition.org/edso/2525

Edwards‐Groves C, Brennan Kemmis R, Hardy I, Ponte P. Relational architectures: recovering solidarity and agency as living practices in education. Pedagogy, Culture & Society [periódico na Internet]. 2010 [acesso em 2017 Dez 5];18(1):43-54. Disponível em : https://doi.org/10.1080/14681360903556814

Bowie JE, Werhane PH. Management Ethics. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell; 2004.

Roloff J. Learning from Multi-Stakeholder Networks: Issue-Focussed Stakeholder Management [periódico na Internet]. Journal of Business Ethics. 2008 [acesso em 2017 Dez 5];82(1):233-50. Disponível em: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10551-007-9573-3

Coelho JS. Construindo a participação social no SUS: um constante repensar em busca de equidade e transformação. Saúde e Sociedade [periódico na Internet]. 2012 [acesso em 2017 Dez 5];21: 138-51. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0104-12902012000500012

Rocha PR, David HMSL. Determination or determinants? A debate based on the Theory on the Social Production of Health. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP [periódico na Internet]. 2015 [acesso em 2017 Dez 5];49: 129-35. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0080-623420150000100017

Rolim LB, Cruz RSBLC, Sampaio KJAJ. Participação popular e o controle social como diretriz do SUS: uma revisão narrativa. Saúde em Debate [periódico na Internet]. 2013 [acesso em 2017 Dez 5];37:139-47. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-11042013000100016

Costa DFC, Paulon SM. Participação Social e protagonismo em saúde mental: a insurgência de um coletivo. Saúde em Debate [periódico na Internet]. 2012 [acesso em 2017 Dez 5];36:572-82. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-11042012000400009

Fals Borda O. Investigación Participativa. Montevideo: La Banda Oriental; 1987.

Brandão CR. Repensando a Pesquisa Participante. São Paulo, SP: Brasiliense; 1984.

Brandão CR. Pesquisa Participante. São Paulo, SP: Brasiliense; 1981.

Barbier R. La Recherche Action dans l’Institution Éducative. Paris, FR: Gauthier-Villars; 1977.

Lapassade G. Recherche-action externe et recherche-action interne. Pratiques de Formation-Analyses. 1989(18).

Lewin K, Lewin GW. Resolving social conflicts: selected papers on group dynamics. Nova York, EUA: Harper and Brothers; 1948.

Melo ASE, Maia Filho ON, Chaves HV. Lewin e a pesquisa-ação: gênese, aplicação e finalidade. Fractal: Revista de Psicologia [periódico na Internet]. 2016 [acesso em 2017 Dez 5];28:153-9. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1984-0292/1162

Banks S, Armstrong A, Carter K, Graham H, Hayward P, Henry A, et al. Everyday ethics in community-based participatory research. Contemporary Social Science [periódico na Internet]. 2013 [acesso em 2017 Dez 5];8(3):263-77. Disponível em: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/21582041.2013.769618

Gatto Júnior JR, Sousa LA, Pesce S, Fortuna CM. Reflexões Críticas sobre Participação em Pesquisas com Metodologias Participativas. In: 6º Congresso Íbero-Americano de Investigação Qualitativa; 2017 Jul 12-14; Salamanca; 2017.

Bondía JL. Notas sobre a experiência e o saber de experiência. Revista Brasileira de Educação [periódico na Internet]. 2002 [acesso em 2017 Dez 5];(19):20-8. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-24782002000100003

Bondía JL. Experiência e alteridade em Educação. Revista Reflexão e Ação [periódico na Internet]. 2011 [acesso em 2017 Dez 5];19(2):04-27. Disponível em: https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/reflex/article/view/2444/1898

Dick B. Postgraduate programs using action research. The Learning Organization [periódico na Internet]. 2002 [acesso em 2017 Dez 5];9(4):159-70. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1108/09696470210428886

Minayo MCS, Zito Guerriero IC. Reflexividade como éthos da pesquisa qualitativa. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva [periódico na Internet]. 2014 [acesso em 2017 Dez 5]; 19(4):1103-12. Disponível em: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=63030543011

Dick B. Action research and evaluation online email-based course. Australia: Southern Cross University and the Southern Cross Institute of Action Research; 2002. Disponível em: http://www.aral.com.au/areol/areolind.html

Argyris C, Putman R, Smith DM. Action science: concepts, methods and skills for research and intervention. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1985.

Kristiansen M, Bloch-Poulsen J. Participação na Pesquisa-ação: entre a metodologia e a visão de mundo, participação e codeterminação. Trabalho & Educação [periódico na Internet]. 2013 [acesso em 2017 Dez 5]; 22(1). Disponível em: https://seer.ufmg.br/index.php/trabedu/article/view/7502/5808

Kim J. Youth Involvement in Participatory Action Research (PAR): Challenges and Barriers. Critical Social Work [periódico na Internet]. 2016 [acesso em 2017 Dez 5]; 17(1). Disponível em: http://www1.uwindsor.ca/criticalsocialwork/youth_involvement

Edwards-Groves C, Olin A, Karlberg-Granlund G. Partnership and recognition in action research: understanding the practices and practice architectures for participation and change. Educational Action Research [periódico na Internet]. 2016 [acesso em 2017 Dez 5];24(3):321-33. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2015.1129983

Dick B, Sankaran S, Shaw K, Kelly J, Soar J, Davies A, et al. Action research as metamethodology: managing the complexity of an applied research project. In: 14th European Academy of Management Conference (EURAM 2014): Waves and Winds of Strategic Leadership for Sustainable Competitiveness; 2014 Jun 4-7; Valencia, ES; 2014.

Kemmis S, McTaggart R, Nixon R. The action research planner: doing critical participatory action research. Singapore: Springer; 2014.

McAllister S. Developing home-school partnership: from concepts to practice. New York, NY: Teachers' College Press; 1993.

Monceau G. Técnicas socioclínicas para a análise institucional das práticas sociais. Psicologia em Revista [periódico na Internet]. 2015 [acesso em 2017 Dez 5];21:197-217. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/DOI-10.5752/P.1678-9523.2015V21N1P197

Published

2018-11-29

How to Cite

Gatto Júnior, J. R., Sousa, L. A. de, Pesce, S., & Fortuna, C. M. (2018). Participation in Researches with Participative Methodologies: Reflections about Experiences. Brazilian Journal in Health Promotion, 31. https://doi.org/10.5020/18061230.2018.8643