The impact of work-related psychosocial factors on the health and work ability of municipal transit agents

Authors

  • Aldo Pacheco Ferreira Centro de Estudos da Saúde do Trabalhador e Ecologia Humana, Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brasil
  • Ana Paula Carneiro Carvalho Núcleo de Coordenação de Políticas de Saúde do Trabalhador, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brasil

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5020/18061230.2016.p472

Keywords:

Work Capacity Evaluation, Psychosocial Impact, Health Policy, Health Promotion

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the impact of work-related psychosocial factors on the health and work ability of municipal transit agents. Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out with a sample of 118 subjects at the municipality of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil, during 2014. They answered two questionnaires: Work Ability Index – WAI and Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire - COPSOQ. These questionnaires collected information regarding how well a worker is able to perform his or her work; and on the psychosocial factors related to their work, health status, and welfare. The statistical analyses were carried out using the calculation of central tendency and dispersion measures. Results: The analysis of objectivity, acceptance, practicability, sensitivity and content validity of the questionnaires as a whole did not show any problematic result, with some limitations regarding their length. A significant association between WAI and COPSOQ was observed. The prevalence of good capacity for work was among the subjects aged between 31 and 50 years (p=0.012). However, concerning the job satisfaction, 28 (23.73%) denoted being satisfied, 74 (62.71%) partly satisfied, and 16 (13.56%) were dissatisfied. The ability index was 36.8 points, and the prevalence of good capacity for work was 76.27%. Conclusion: The results revealed that better physical and mental health are associated with greater work ability, representing that, the better the worker’s health, the greater his work ability. The psychosocial work environment and, especially, the decision-making autonomy were thus important determinants of self-rated quality of life in this group of transit agents.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Aldo Pacheco Ferreira, Centro de Estudos da Saúde do Trabalhador e Ecologia Humana, Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brasil

Centro de Estudos da Saúde do Trabalhador e Ecologia Humana, Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brasil

Ana Paula Carneiro Carvalho, Núcleo de Coordenação de Políticas de Saúde do Trabalhador, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brasil

Núcleo de Coordenação de Políticas de Saúde do Trabalhador, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brasil

References

Tuomi K, Ilmarinen J, Jahkola A, Katajarinne L, Tulkki A. Índice de capacidade para o trabalho. São Carlos: Edufscar; 2005.

Riedel N, Müller A, Ebener M. Applying strategies of selection, optimization, and compensation to maintain work ability: a cohort study on work, age, and health in Germany. J Occup Environ Med. 2015;57(5):552-61.

Hotopp U. The ageing workforce: a health issue? Econ Labour Market Rev. 2007;1(2):30-5.

Oberlinner C, Yong M, Nasterlack M, Pluto RP, Lang S. Combined effect of back pain and stress on work ability. Occup Med (Lond). 2015;65(2):147-53.

Sabin-Farrell R, Turpin G. Vicarious traumatization: implications for the mental health of health workers? Clin Psychol Rev. 2003;23(3):449-80.

Wisniewski D, Gróss G, Bittencourt R. A influência da sobrecarga de trabalho do enfermeiro na qualidade da assistência pré-natal. Rev Bras Promoç Saúde. 2014;27(2):177-82.

Ilmarinen J. Work ability: a comprehensive concept for occupational health research and prevention. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2009;35(1):1-5.

Dejours C. Subjetividade, trabalho e ação. Rev Prod. 2004;14(3):27-34.

, Araújo TM, Graça C, Araújo E. Estresse ocupacional e saúde: contribuições do Modelo Demanda-Controle. Ciênc Saúde Coletiva. 2003;8(4):991-1003.

Murta S, Tróccoli B. Avaliação de Intervenção em Estresse Ocupacional. Psicologia: Teoria & Pesquisa. 2004;20(1):39-47.

Jacques MG, Codo W. Saúde mental & trabalho: leituras. Petrópolis: Vozes; 2002.

Cherian J, Singh Z, Bazroy J, Purty AJ, Natesan M, Chavada VK. Study of morbidity pattern among salt workers in Marakkanam, Tamil Nadu, India. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9(4):LC01-3.

Martinez MC, Latorre MRDO, Fischer FM. Capacidade para o trabalho: revisão de literatura. Ciênc Saúde Coletiva. 2010;15(Suppl 1):1553-61.

Emberland JS, Knardahl S. Contribution of psychological, social, and mechanical work exposures to low work ability: a prospective study. J Occup Environ Med. 2015;57(3):300-14.

Tabanelli MC, Depolo M, Cooke RMT, Sarchielli G, Bonfiglioli R, Mattioli S, et al. Available instruments for measurement of psychosocial factors in the work environment. Journal International Arch Occupat Environ Health. 2008; 82(1):1-12.

Quinlan M, Mayhew C, Bohle P. The global expansion of precarious employment, work disorganization, and consequences for occupational health: a review of recent research. Int J Health Serv. 2001; 31(2):335-414.

Fischer FM, Oliveira DC, Nagai R, Teixeira LR, Márcio L Júnior, Latorrec MRDO, et al. Job control, job demands, social support at work and health among adolescent workers. Rev Saúde Pública. 2005;39(2):245-53.

Dollard MF, Skinner N, Tuckey MR, Bailey T. National surveillance of psychosocial risk factors in the workplace: An international overview. Work Stress. 2007;21(1):1-29.

McDonough P, Amick BC. The social context of health selection: A longitudinal study of health and employment. Social Sci & Med. 2001; 53:135-145.

Mann S, Holdsworth L. The psychological impact of teleworking: Stress, emotions and health. New Technol Work Employment. 2003;18(3):196-211.

Lucchini RG, London L. Global occupational health: current challenges and the need for urgent action. Ann Glob Health. 2014;80(4):251-6.

Kristensen TS, Hannerz H, Høgh A, Borg V. The Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ)- a tool for the assessment and improvement of the psychosocial work environment. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2005;31(6):438-49.

Law M, Cooper B, Strong S, Stewart D, Rigby P, Letts L. The Person-Environment-Occupation Model: a transactive approach to occupational performance. Can J Occupat Therapy. 1996;63(1):9-23.

García-Rodríguez A, Gutiérrez-Bedmar M, Bellón- Saameño JA, Muñoz-Bravo C, Fernández-Crehuet Navajas J. Psychosocial stress environment and health workers in public health: Differences between primary and hospital care. Aten Primaria. 2014;47(6):359-66.

Rabe M, Giacomuzzi S, Nübling M. Psychosocial workload and stress in the workers’ representative. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:909.

Ilmarinen J, Tuomi K, Seitsamo J. New dimensions of work ability. Int Congress Series. 2005;1280:3-7.

Ilmarinen J, Tuomi K. Promoting excellent work ability and preventing poor work ability: the same determinants? Results from the Swedish HAKuL study. Occup Environ Med. 2006;63(2):113-20.

Thorsen VS, Bjorner BJ. Reliability of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire. Scand J Publ Health. 2010; 38(Suppl 3):25-32.

Tabatabaei S, Hosseinian S, Gharanjiki B. General Health, Stress associated to the work and job satisfaction of Hormozgan cement factory employees in Iran. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2011;30:1897-1901.

Roxana AC. Social support as a mediator between emotion work and job satisfaction. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2013:84:601-6.

Moniarou-Papaconstantinou V, Triantafyllou K. Job satisfaction and work values: Investigating sources of job satisfaction with respect to information professionals. Libr Inf Sci Res. 2015;37(2):164-70.

Peralta N, Godoi AGV, Griep RH, Miller L. Validez y confiabilidad del Índice de Capacidad para el Trabajo en trabajadores del primer nivel de atención de salud em Argentina. Salud Colect. 2012;8(2):163-73.

Messenger JC. Working time and workers’ preferences in industrialized countries: finding the balance. Routledge; 2004.

Johnson JV. Control, collectivity and the psychosocial work environment. In: Sauter SL, Hurrell JJ Jr, Cooper CL, editors. Job control and worker health. Chichester: Jon Wiley & Sons; 1989.

Camelo S, Angerami E. Riscos psicossociais no trabalho que podem levar ao estresse: Uma análise da literatura. Ciênc Cuid Saúde. 2008;7(2):232-40.

Glina D, Rocha L, Batista M, Mendonça M. Saúde mental e trabalho: uma reflexão sobre o nexo com o trabalho e o diagnóstico com base na prática. Cad Saúde Pública. 2001;17(3):607-16.

Strazdins L, D’Souza RM, Lim LL, Broom DH, Rodgers B. Job strain, job insecurity, and health: rethinking the relationship. J Occupat Health Psychol. 2004;9(4):296-305.

Nygård CH, Eskelinen L, Suvanto S, Tuomi K, Ilmarinen J. Associations between functional capacity and work ability among elderly municipal employees. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1991;17(Suppl 1):122-7.

Ilmarinen J, Tuomi K, Klockars M. Changes in the work ability of active employees over an 11-year period. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1997;17(Suppl1):49-57.

Assunção AA, Sampaio RF, Nascimento LMB. Agir em empresas de pequena e média dimensão para promover a saúde dos trabalhadores: o caso do setor de alimentos e bebidas. Braz J Phys Ther. 2010;14(1):52-9.

Minayo Gomez C, Machado JMH, Pena PGL. Saúde do trabalhador na sociedade brasileira contemporânea. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Fiocruz; 2011.

Downloads

Published

2016-11-29

How to Cite

Ferreira, A. P., & Carvalho, A. P. C. (2016). The impact of work-related psychosocial factors on the health and work ability of municipal transit agents. Brazilian Journal in Health Promotion, 29(4), 471–479. https://doi.org/10.5020/18061230.2016.p472

Issue

Section

Original Articles