Representations of dating apps for Brazilian users

Antônio Carlos de Barros Júnior; Larissa Maria de Castro Alves; Andrea Siomara de Siqueira; Mario Amore Cecchini

doi:10.5020/23590777.rs.v23i4.e14042

Authors

Dr. Antônio de Barros Júnior Paulista University (Unip), São Paulo, SP, Brazil https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4950-6868
Larissa Paulista University (Unip), São Paulo, SP, Brazil https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9417-2986
Prof. Andrea Siqueira Municipal Faculty Professor Franco Montoro, Mogi Guaçu, São Paulo, Brazil https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6695-8030
Prof. Mario Cecchini Paulista University (Unip), São Paulo, SP, Brazil https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5853-3422

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5020/23590777.rs.v23i4.e14042

Keywords:

dating apps, virtual relationships, Psychology

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate representations of dating apps for Brazilian users, and whether there were differences regarding sex, sexual orientation and age. It had quantitative and qualitative approaches. Instrument used for data collection was an online questionnaire. Spontaneous responses brought up representations linked to unspecified relationships, feelings of discomfort or suffering, and practicality. Most prevalent closed-question representations were practicality, getting initial information before meeting people and searching for a stable love relationship. Establishing a long-term relationship was more prevalent in women and heterosexuals in general; aiming for sex was more prevalent in men and homosexuals, and living veiled experiences that cannot be openly experienced in face-to-face life was more prevalent in homosexuals. There were little statistically significant differences related to age. Despite changes in contemporary love relationships, traditional social representations are still in place: linked to the search for an ideal partner (women) and for sex and a transgressive jouissance (men). Apps reflect search for practicality and utilitarianism of postmodern capitalism in large cities, but also fun and pastime.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Dr. Antônio de Barros Júnior, Paulista University (Unip), São Paulo, SP, Brazil

Psychoanalyst, PhD and Master in Social Psychology from the University of Sao Paulo (USP), Brazil. Affiliated to the Brazilian Institute of Winnicottian Psychoanalysis (IBPW). Research here in question carried out within the Institute of Human Sciences, Paulista University (Unip), Brazil.

Areas of expertise: Psychoanalysis, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology.
Research areas: internet, virtual social networks; subjects, postmodernity; work, organizations, unemployment.

Larissa, Paulista University (Unip), São Paulo, SP, Brazil

Specialization in Analytical Psychology (PUC-SP) (in progress). Graduated in Psychology from the Institute of Human Sciences, Paulista University, Sao Paulo, Brazil

Prof. Andrea Siqueira, Municipal Faculty Professor Franco Montoro, Mogi Guaçu, São Paulo, Brazil

Master in Social Psychology from the Institute of Psychology of the University of Sao Paulo (USP). Adjunct Professor at the Municipal Faculty Professor Franco Montoro, Mogi Guaçu, Brazil

Prof. Mario Cecchini, Paulista University (Unip), São Paulo, SP, Brazil

Doctoral candidate in Psychology at the University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom. Master in Sciences from the Department of Neurology of the Faculty of Medicine of Sao Paulo University (USP). Professor at Paulista University (Unip).

References

Andrade, D. S. V. (2016). Solteiras/os procuram? Sobre sexualidade e solteirice em Salvador. Revista Feminismos, 4(2/3). https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/feminismos/article/view/30220.

Bardin, L. (2013). L’analyse de contenu (2d ed.). PUF.

Bauman, Z. (2003). Liquid love: On the frailty of human bonds. Polity Press.

Biasus, F., Demantova, A., & Camargo, B. V. (2011). Representações sociais do envelhecimento e da sexualidade para

pessoas com mais de 50 anos. Temas em Psicologia, 19(1), 319-336. http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_

arttext&pid=S1413-389X2011000100025&lng=pt&tlng=pt.

Birman, J. (2011). Mal-estar na atualidade: A psicanálise e as novas formas de subjetivação (8th ed.). Civilização Brasileira.

Blake, K., Portingale, J., Giles, S., Griffiths, S., & Krug, I. (2022). Dating app usage and motivations for dating app usage are associated with increased disordered eating. Journal of Eating Disorders, 10(1), 1-10. https://jeatdisord.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40337-022-00693-9

Bryant, K., & Sheldon, P. (2017). Cyber dating in the age of mobile apps: Understanding motives, attitudes, and characteristics of users. American Communication Journal, 19(2). https://www.csus.edu/faculty/m/fred.molitor/docs/cyber-dating.pdf.

Bussinger, R. V. (2013). “Somos ensinados a pensar em sexo”: Representações sociais de masculinidades e de amor em travestis, homens gays e homens heterossexuais. [PhD Thesis], Federal University of Espírito Santo. Repositório

Institucional da UFES.http://repositorio.ufes.br/bitstream/10/1292/6/tese_4498_TESE_CORRIGIDA1%20%281%29.pdf.

Castells, M. (2010). The rise of the network society - the information age: Economy, society and culture – volume I (2nd ed.). Wiley Blackwell.

Cravo, C. L. (2014) Representações sociais de homens e mulheres sobre a solteirice de pessoas com mais de 40 anos. [Master’s Thesis], Federal University of Espírito Santo. http://repositorio.ufes.br/handle/10/3101

Czernecka, J. (2020). Singlehood among young and middle age women in Poland - stereotypes in the mass media vs. single women’s opinions. Revista Feminismos, 7(1). https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/feminismos/article/view/35755

Couto, E. S., Souza, J. D. F. de & Nascimento, S. P. (2013, October 10th and 11th). Grindr e Scruff: Amor e sexo na cibercultura. Anais do 3º Simpósio em tecnologias digitais e sociabilidade. Performances Interacionais e Mediações Sociotécnicas. GITS – Research Group on Interactions, Digital Technologies and Society at the Federal University of Bahia/Salvador. http://gitsufba.net/anais/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/13n1_grindr_49464.pdf

Degen, J., Kleeberg-Niepage, A. (2022). The more we Tinder: Subjects, selves and society. Hu Arena, 5, 179–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-020-00132-8

eHarmony Editorial Team (2017). Future of dating 2050: The impact of a changing society. future foundation. https://www.eharmony.co.uk/dating-advice/dating/future-of-dating-2050/#.Wh_bY4G0O3C

Harrison, M. G., McAnulty, R. D., &Canevello, A. (2022). College students’ motives for in-person meetings with dating

application matches. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 25(2), 130-134. http://doi.org/10.1089/

cyber.2021.0031

Holtzhausen, N., Fitzgerald, K., Thakur, I., Ashley, J., Rolfe, M., & Pit, S. W. (2020). Swipe-based dating applications

use and its association with mental health outcomes: A cross-sectional study. BMC psychology, 8(1), 1-12. https://

bmcpsychology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40359-020-0373-1?fd=5317710456904024|5456507360795513

&lp=/dating-apps-mental-health

Illouz, E. (2019). Emodities o la invención de los commodities emocionales. In: E. Illouz (Coord.), Capitalismo, consumo yautenticidad: Las emociones como mercancía. (pp. 1-41). Katz.

James, J. L. (2015). Mobile dating in the digital age: Computer-mediated communication and relationship building on tinder. [Master’s thesis], Texas State University, San Marcos, Texas. https://digital.library.txstate.edu/handle/10877/5529

Kehl, M. R. (2002). Sobre ética e psicanálise. Companhia das Letras.

Lacan, J. (2007). Ecrits: the first complete edition in English. W. W. Norton & Company. (Original work published in 1966).

Lacan, J. (2014). The Seminar, book X: Anxiety, 1962–1963. Polity Press.

Lacan, J. (2020). The Seminar, book V: Formations of the unconscious, 1957-1958. Polity Press.

Lasch, C. (1991) The culture of narcissism: American life in an age of diminishing expectations. Norton. (Original work published in 1979).

Lenton-Brym, A. P., Santiago, V. A., Fredborg, B. K., & Antony, M. M. (2021). Associations between social anxiety, depression, and use of mobile dating applications. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 24(2), 86-93. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2019.0561

Linne, J. (2020). “No sos vos, es Tinder”. Gamificación, consumo, gestión cotidiana y performance en aplicaciones de

“levante”. Convergencia, 27, e13365. https://doi.org/10.29101/crcs.v27i0.13365

Maia, J., & Bianchi, E. (2013) A caçada começou: Tecnologia de geolocalização em aplicativos de redes sociais gays.

Anais do XXXVI Congresso Brasileiro de Ciências da Comunicação. IntercomBrazilian Society for Interdisciplinary

Communication Studies – Manaus/AM. http://www.intercom.org.br/papers/nacionais/2013/resumos/R8-0411-1.pdf

Maia, J., & Bianchi, E. (2014). Tecnologia de geolocalização: Grindr e Scruff redes geosociais gays. Logos, 2(24). https://doi.org/10.12957/logos.2014.14157

Mezan, R. (2002) Interfaces da psicanálise. Companhia das Letras.

Moscovici, S. (2001). Social representations: Explorations in Social Psychology. New York University Press.

Pommier, G. (2000). Pour l’amour du père et du phallus : L’homosexualité en première ligne. Révue Internationale – La clinique lacanienne: les homossexualités, 4(1). https://www.editions-eres.com/ouvrage/766/les-homosexualites

Ranzini, G., & Lutz, C. (2017). Love at first swipe? Explaining Tinder self-presentation and motives. Mobile Media &

Communication, 5(1), 80–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157916664559

Rosenfeld, M., Thomas, R. &Husen, S. (2019). Disintermediating your friends: How online dating in the United States

displaces other ways of meeting. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,

(36), 17753-17758. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1908630116

Roudinesco, E., & Plon, M. (2006). Dictionnaire de la psychanalyse (3d ed.). Fayar.

Santos, I. C. L. dos (2015). “Mulher Solteira Procura”: Um estudo em torno da solteirice na representação social feminina. Polêm!ca, 14, 01-22. https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/polemica/article/view/14263

Santos, S. C. dos. (2016, August 3rd to 6th). “Meu Tinder tá bombando!”Geolocalização, sociabilidade e vivências da

sexualidade. Anais da 30ª Reunião Brasileira de Antropologia, Federal University of Paraiba, João Pessoa/PB. http://

evento.abant.org.br/rba/30rba/files/1468606843_ARQUIVO_GT010MeuTindertabombando_Sheila.pdf

Santos, S. C. dos. (2018). Curtir ou não curtir: Experimentações a partir do Tinder. [Master’s thesis], Federal University of Paraiba, João Pessoa/PB https://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/handle/123456789/13246

Sevi, B. (2019). The dark side of Tinder. Journal of Individual Differences, 40(4), 242–246. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000297

Silva, K. R., de Andrade-Serejo, R. D., de Souza, G. B. D., & de Souza, J. C. P. (2021). As relações amorosas de jovens

manauenses no aplicativo de namoro Tinder. Research, Society and Development, 10(13), e318101321321-e318101321321. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i13.21321

Sumter, S. R., Vandenbosch, L., & Ligtenberg, L. (2017). Love me Tinder: Untangling emerging adults’ motivations for

using the dating application Tinder. Telematics and Informatics, 34(1), 67-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.04.009.

Timmermans, E., & De Caluwé, E. (2017a). Development and validation of the Tinder Motives Scale (TMS). Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 341-350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.028.

Timmermans, E., & De Caluwé, E. (2017b). To Tinder or not to Tinder, that’s the question: An individual differences perspective to Tinder use and motives. Personality and Individual Differences, 110, 74-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.01.026

Trevisan, J. S. (2004). Devassos no paraíso: A homossexualidade no Brasil, da colônia à atualidade. (6th ed.). Record.

Zapata, I., Vargas, J., & Marín-Cortés, A. (2021). Una revisión de alcance sobre las relaciones entre vínculos sexo-afectivos y tecnologías digitales. Diversitas: PerspectivasenPsicología, 17(2), 20-36. https://doi.org/10.15332/22563067.7075